![]() |
| Thumbs up? |
What is interesting from a competition law perspective is that the Bill seeks to exempt the banking sector from the applicability of Section 5 and 6 of the Competition Act, 2002. The proposed Section 2A of the Act states that Competition Act will not be applicable “to any banking company, the SBI, any subsidiary bank, any corresponding new bank or any regional rural bank or cooperative bank in respect of matters relating to amalgamation, merger, reconstruction, transfer, reconstitution or acquisition…”
The proposed Section 2A reads as follows:
2A. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in section 2, nothing contained in the Competition Act, 2002 shall apply to any banking company, the State Bank of India, any subsidiary bank, any corresponding new bank or any regional rural bank or co-operative bank or multi-state co-operative bank in respect of the matters relating to amalgamation, merger, reconstruction, transfer, reconstitution or acquisition under—
(i) this Act;
(ii) the State Bank of India Act, 1955;
(iii) the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959;
(iv) the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970;
(v) the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976;
(vi) the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980;
(vii) the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002; and
(viii) any State law relating to co-operative societies.
This issue was discussed by the Standing Committee on Finance (2011-12) of the Lok Sabha before the Cabinet cleared the Bill for introduction in the Lok Sabha. The rationale given by the Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, is as follows:
Banking is some kind of an entity and the trust of people on the banking system is paramount. There are times when decisions have to be taken very quickly. Competition Commission‘s procedures gives sometime for scrutiny and for decision to be taken. Our financial sector in some sense is getting strengthened and it would take sometime to find them as quick to be US or EU kind of a system. So after great deliberations the Government took the view that we will keep the mergers and acquisitions of banks with the RBI. Obviously, when time demands, we will revisit. For the time being, the Government‘s careful consideration is that it remains with the RBI so that we are in a position to ensure the safety, security, trust and confidence of people in the banking system are maintained. Today, until the financial system becomes very strong we need to ensure that the depositors, the customers and stakeholders in the system retain their faith in the financial system of the Government. So, the best way is to keep it within the confines of the Reserve Bank of India. Otherwise, all issues would be published, everything would come into public domain, people would think this is unsafe, and the confidence in the system would be shaken and it would become a run on the bank, not only on one but on other banks also. So, a kind of stability should be provided.
There is a procedure under the existing Competition Act for a certain period of time when application is given should be in the public domain, some investigation has to be made, after investigation, the same has to be proposed to the Commission Members; they have to scrutinize -it can take a good amount of time.
Hon‘ble Members are aware, I know, that certain mergers have been done with an overnight kind of a focus and it has stood the test of time because the confidence of the people in the financial system got restored as a result of such actions were taken. So, that is the reason. Let me look at the NPAs, the financial stability, those kinds of things-unless we come to that mature level, it will take some more time to get into that.
The Standing Committee agreed with the view of the Department and stated that this exemption should be considered as a special case and should be revisited in the future in light of the experience gained by both, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) as well as the Reserve Bank of India.
The explanation of the Department of Finance should be revisited in light of the order in the HSBC-RBS combination. This is till date the only combination in the banking sector which has been decided upon by the CCI. In this case, the CCI received notice of the combination on the March 27, 2012 and the order of the CCI was released on the April 19, 2012.
Further, the Department of Finance states that this exemption "would be revisited... when time demands". This gives a overarching jurisdictional power to RBI on the matter and there is no definitive time frame when this would be revisited.
Further, it is also pertinent to note that the telecom sector is also lobbying for an exemption from the applicability of the Competition Act in the sector.
An excellent article by Mr. Pradeep Mehta in the Business Standard on this issue is here.
Update (May 18, 2012) - An article by Dr. S.L. Rao in the Financial Express on this issue is here. Incidentally Dr. Rao is also a member of the Eminent Persons Advisory Group of the CCI.
While the two articles linked above are both for allowing the CCI to regulate mergers and acquisitions in the banking sector, a number of experts have made a counter-argument as well. You can visit the Fun Comp Forum moderated by the CUTS Centre for Competition, Investment and Economic Regulation.
Update (May 18, 2012) - An article by Dr. S.L. Rao in the Financial Express on this issue is here. Incidentally Dr. Rao is also a member of the Eminent Persons Advisory Group of the CCI.
While the two articles linked above are both for allowing the CCI to regulate mergers and acquisitions in the banking sector, a number of experts have made a counter-argument as well. You can visit the Fun Comp Forum moderated by the CUTS Centre for Competition, Investment and Economic Regulation.

This is an issue that has troubled competition authorities all around the world and I completely agree with Anshuman that this is quite a disturbing development in Indian competition law. I have two points to make about this move.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, exempting bank mergers from the CCI's jurisdiction seems to be based on an assumption that inducing competition in the banking sector will undermine the stability and 'security' of the banking system leading to a loss of 'trust' in the system. Although economic literature is mixed on whether competition necessarily undermines stability in the banking system, even the most cynical of economists wouldn't suggest that competition is so bad for the banking system that it should not be considered at all. The benefits of competition in the banking sector are no different from other sectors. Competition in banks has led to better services and wider choice for consumers. E.g Which bank was open later than 4 or 5 pm before ICICI started its 8 to 8 policy? Other banks have also extended their opening times now due to competitive pressure. I do agree that the peculiarities of the banking sector require other prudential considerations to be taken account of. But a balance must be found. In fact almost every country (with a few exceptions like France) have some role for competition authorities in banking mergers. Unfortunately this bill takes the extreme step of completely excluding competition considerations.
Secondly such problems are already foreseen under the Competition Act (http://cci.gov.in/images/media/competition_act/act2002.pdf?phpMyAdmin=QuqXb-8V2yTtoq617iR6-k2VA8d) which provides for consultation between the CCI and other statutory authorities (S.21 and 21 A). Perhaps it could be made mandatory in case of banking mergers for the CCI to consult the RBI. A system of joint review could also be worked out.
The ultimate point is a balance can and should be found between the interests of ‘competition’ and ‘stability’ and excluding one in favour of the other can lead to undesirable results.
The spin off effect this is going to have on other sectors (as Anshuman has pointed out) is also going to be a major problem.